Fruight (or frught), not fruit.

 Fruight is frequently spelt without the "gh" it should be spelt with.  To spell it "fruit" is to deny the etymology of the word.  Because in German it is spelled "frucht", we ought to restore the historical spelling and add back in the <gh>.

CHANGE MY MIND!!!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Towards and toward

     Contrary to what this article says , there is a correct way to use "toward" and "towards", and that is never using one twice in a row.  You have to alternate them each time you use one.  If you just said "toward", you can't say "toward" again until you say "towards" and vice versa.  If you don't do that, you seem to have such a small vocabulary that you can't give variety in your speech. CHANGE MY MIND!!!
Read more

About "-us" and "-um" as far as plurals are concerned

      I have stumbled upon a post by lexico saying that "cacti" is wrong, and so is "viri".  They are wrong.  Their logic is that since these words aren't latin in origin, we can't pluralise them with -i.  Pay no attention to these ignorami.  It is only correct to pluralise multisylabic words ending in "-us" and not in "-ous" with "-i" or "-odes".  ie. "cactodes" and "cacti" are correct, but "cactuses" isn't, despite what Lexico would have you believe.  An exception to this rule is "nucleus" when used in the context of a cell.  Also, Lexico says "algæ", of all things, is correct, and the plural of "alga" as opposed to "algie", "alge", "algea" being the correct way to refer to it.  Algea is the correct term which is an uncountable noun, and the word "alga" which Lexico made up should only be used if you are writing fo...
Read more

The plurals of "moose" "house" and "mongoose"

"Mongeese", "hice", and "meese" are acceptable plurals, as well as "mongooses", "houses", and "mooses".  All of these are correct, and there can be more than one plural for each word, all of which may be used interchangably, however, as will be per usual, irregulars are preferable, especially "mongeese". In the interest of regularity, the extention of the "geese" and "mouse" paradigm should be extended to include "mongoose", "house", and "moose".  And I have, as a person on the internet, made it right by putting it in a style guide that you can cite. CHANGE MY MIND!!!
Read more