Correct negation.

 Of course to negate the infinitive of a verb it should be split, but if you are negating the present tense of a verb without an -s on the end of it due to it needing to agree with the subject, then you must negate, if using simple present tense, use the negation suffix.  "doesn't" and "don't" are incorrect in these cases because that also marks the negation as of the eternal tense.  The correct way to negate is to use -n't.  This means that the satement without -n't is one of falsehood, and that it furthermore is, in fact, not true.  An example would be "I drinkn't alcohol".  This is implying that it is the present, and the moments surrounding, not simply the present state of the subject, but it also applies to the object in the same way.  It is also destinguished from "isn't _____ing" because that is the now-tense.

CHANGE MY MIND!!!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Φersu, the newest english word, taken right from Etruscan.

 We should loan the etruscan word "φersu" with the plural "φersuar".  We could spell it the way the etruscans did too!  It is the origin of person, and it means a mask worn in a play.  No, I do not care that this will be the third word we took from "𐌘𐌄𐌓𐌔𐌖".  Normally I would advocate this "φersuar" as the correct spelling for "person", and if the "n" was silent, then I would, but I think we need to loan it because we need more loans from Etruscan.  Also, Ynglish has some doublets already, so why not make some more? I believe we should combat the Romancisation of Ynglish by loaning from other languages.  This being said, because loanwords do not usually displace words from the lexicon of a language when coming into the wordhoard, I think we should be even more liberal when loaning, and also when coining simply because this gives us even more of a rich diversity of synonyms and near synonyms, and also makes it easier to rhy...
Read more

About "-us" and "-um" as far as plurals are concerned

      I have stumbled upon a post by lexico saying that "cacti" is wrong, and so is "viri".  They are wrong.  Their logic is that since these words aren't latin in origin, we can't pluralise them with -i.  Pay no attention to these ignorami.  It is only correct to pluralise multisylabic words ending in "-us" and not in "-ous" with "-i" or "-odes".  ie. "cactodes" and "cacti" are correct, but "cactuses" isn't, despite what Lexico would have you believe.  An exception to this rule is "nucleus" when used in the context of a cell.  Also, Lexico says "algæ", of all things, is correct, and the plural of "alga" as opposed to "algie", "alge", "algea" being the correct way to refer to it.  Algea is the correct term which is an uncountable noun, and the word "alga" which Lexico made up should only be used if you are writing fo...
Read more