The plural of "mook"

 The correct plural of "mook" is "meek".  "mooks" Is always wrong, and should never be used if you want to sound like a person and not an idiot. 

CHANGE MY MIND!!!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Fruight (or frught), not fruit.

 Fruight is frequently spelt without the "gh" it should be spelt with.  To spell it "fruit" is to deny the etymology of the word.  Because in German it is spelled "frucht", we ought to restore the historical spelling and add back in the <gh>. CHANGE MY MIND!!!
Read more

Mid sentence "?" and "!".

If a question is the first part of a compound sentence, and is handwritten, then the glyph should have a comma replacing the period at the bottom.  The same goes for excalmation points if the exclamation ends halfway through the sentence.  Sadly, unicode doesn't have these glyphs, but for the question mark, it can be approximated by using "ʔ" with a combining comma below, as "ʔ̦".  For exclamation marks, "!," is okay, "‽".  For punctuation of sarcasm, since "/s" is seperate from sentence end punctuation, and can apply to a whole paragraph if it is the line after the paragraph, and as such ",/s" should be used with the sarcasm mark. CHANGE MY MIND!!!
Read more

Only knights should be called sir.

 The title of “sir” should never be used to refer to somebody who is not a knight.  It is only proper to use the prefix of “sir” when the person actually has been bestowed a knighthood.  The correct term is “Guv”.  In the military they should correct the standard response to “guv yes guv”. CHANGE MY MIND!!! Edit: This rule has an exception where a nonknight may be called "sir" in a mocking tone as an insult, mocking how full of themselves they are.
Read more